Friday, 16 February 2024

Disneyism: The One True Mouse

 

Disneyism

Pursue Your Dreams Fearlessly

  While the Disney company is yet to actually create a religion, the doctrines are already in place. If you wish to follow Disney as a religion here is my interpretation.

 

Worship the Mouse

   While we may see Walt Disney as a god, he’s not, he was a man. If we must worship an entity, let us worship Disney’s most recognisable icon, Mickey Mouse.


95 years old (Birthday 18 November 1928) and only slightly different in appearance from when he started, Mickey Mouse is immortal, timeless and the one true mouse.

Cosmology

  While many religions have a cosmology a Disney religion doesn’t really need one. For arguments sake, we can say the Disney Universe was created by Walt Disney. The Walt Disney company is now mostly owned by shareholders with the Disney family only owning about 1%. Many people are involved in decision making and the creative process so the universe was started by Walt Disney but definitive cosmology is hard to explain.

 

Tenets/ commandments

  Sofia the First and Jake the pirate can give us pointers here.  Essentially, we should be good people, that’s what the films tell us . Of course, the more modern Disney films also encourage us, especially females, to be independent, strong and true to ourselves. Things which are starting to sound a little twee, new age and self-congratulatory after it being rammed down our throats by a country accused often of being overtly racist and intolerant, especially in recent years. This however, is about Disneyism as a religion so to summarise, for now,

·        Kindness- Be kind to everybody, without exception

·        Generosity – Generosity of spirit at least

·        Loyalty – Let’s not let Dreamworks or Warner Brothers forget where our loyalty truly lies

·        Honesty – Kind of self-explanatory

·        Courtesy – Have good manners

·        Worship the mouse

 

Place of Worship

  While there are no churches, Disneyism can easily be practised at home. We can, of course, make a pilgrimage to a Disney park . to honour the mouse, but we can worship the mouse anywhere. Of course, we can share this with family and friends. A Disney party with costumes, singing along with the songs and a marathon of Disney is the most fun way to do it of course. If you cannot afford Disney+ there is nothing wrong with doing it the old fashioned way, whether this be through Blu ray, DVD or even VHS. We can also show our devotion with merchandise, we have plenty to choose from. You could also form a local club. Meet up and watch Disney, talk about it, read it, whatever you can do.

 

Becoming a Devoted Follower of The One True Mouse

  Disneyism is not a recognised religion, it may never reach that status but that doesn’t make it invalid. It can be done as fun or as seriously as you like. There may be things you think of that I have missed, if so, let me know and I’ll see about adding it. In the meantime, find other faithful's, spread the word and, as always, remember the main message from the mouse, Pursue Your Dreams Fearlessly.

  In other words, put those ears on and enjoy yourself. 

  

Saturday, 27 May 2023

Lip Sync Battle: My Top 10

 Lip Sync Battle

Please note this is for the US version not the UK one




My Top 10 Lip Sync Battles

  For those who don't know, Lip Sync Battle is a tv show in which celebrities lip sync to well known songs, complete with fun routines and costumes. Many people have favourite performances, these are my favourites. I've rated them by a combination of costume, performance and how much I personally enjoyed them. My favourites didn't always win but, in my opinion, should have. 

10. Michael Phelps - Lose Yourself, Eminem














American swimmer and 23 times Olympic gold medalist, Michael Phelps competed in the live, all star version back in 2016. He became first time winner of this version of the show beating singer John Legend, actor Terry Crews and actress Olivia Munn. His lip sync rendition of Eminem's Lose Yourself won over everyone as he made it his own.

9. Hayley Atwell - Pretty Fly For A White Guy - The Offspring















(Link is to full episode, skip ahead to 3.30 for Atwells performance)

Agent Carter performed the classic 90s rap song to open the show, series 2 episode 12. While she later performed Lady Gaga's Bad Romance in full costume, it was this first performance that wowed me. While she lost to fellow Marvel star Clark Gregg, she proved a serious contender and worthy opponent back in 2016.

8. Clark Gregg - Toxic, Britney Spears





















Agent Coulson beat Agent Carter with this stunning performance. Gregg showed no problem with twerking his way to the top in a performance Ms Spears herself would be proud of. While I enjoyed Ms Atwells first performance I have to agree this performance was the winning one. And yes, that girl on the left is unconsciously, and I'm sure unintentionally, flashing us!

7. Kaley Cuoco - Slave 4 U, Britney Spears














Another Britney song and a performance that earned Cuoco the nickname, Kaley Spears. Complete with albino python, Kaley recreated Spears iconic song and dance but ultimately lost to Josh Gad. Still credited as many people's favourite performance, Cuoco's performance went down in Lip Sync Battle history for it's raunchiness and use of a live animal.

6. Julianne Hough - I Just Had Sex- Lonley Island 





















In full view of dancing partner and brother, Derek Hough, Julianne beat him in the battle with this sexy performance of controversial band Lonley Island's ballad about the joys of sex. With two shirtless male back up dancers, Ms Hough invited the audience to join  her in the celebration of sex. A risqué but fun choice, this gave Julianne the belt of victory.

5. Anne Hathaway - Wrecking Ball - Miley Cyrun















Fully sexing it up, Anne Hathaway beat Emily Blunt to victory with her performance of Wrecking Ball. Fully worth watching if only to see Hathaway literally ride a ball to victory, it almost eclisped Miley's performance with many saying that, upon hearing the song now, they picture Hathaway rather than Cyrus.

4. Terry Crews - A Thousand Miles, Vanessa Carlton
















Fully committing to a truly unforgettable performance, Terry Crews danced to victory whilst paying homage to his White Chicks character's love of the famous song. Captivating the hosts, opponent and audience with his performance, including making his pecs dance, Crews made his mark upon the show holding no prisoners.

3. Stephen Merchant - Dirrty, Christina Aguilera





















Way back in 2015, British actor Stephen Merchant won against Swedish beauty Malin Akerman with his performance of Dirrty. Complete with cage, champs and 'nasty' briefs, Merchant dirty danced his way to victory wearing a union flag vest. With his trademark glasses and ginger hair, Merchant perfectly demonstrated why he is a much beloved comedy actor both sides of the Atlantic.

2. Jenna Dewan - Pony, Ginuwine
















With then husband Channing Tatum, and credited as Jenna Dewan-Tatum, the actress used her dancing skills to great affect in the season 2 premiere while lip syncing Pony. Seducing the audience and making her husband blush, Dewan bumped and grinded to victory. The pair sadly divorced in 2019, but they'll always be remembered for making this the winning performance it was.

1. Tom Holland - Umbrella, Rhianna













Taking a leaf out of Tv sensation Glee's book, this performance began with Holland in a suit performing Singin' In The Rain. Seconds in he transforms and emerges in full Rhianna get up lip syncing Umbrella. In a truly jaw-dropping and legendary performance, the Spiderman star fully commits to the role, showing off his gymnastic skills in a stunning dance routine. You can see co-star and opponent Zendaya admit defeat almost instantly as Holland struts to victory making everyone a little hot under the collar.

So there you have it, my favourite lip sync battle performances to date (27/05/2023). Do you agree? Who starred in your favourite performance? Let me know in the comments.

Friday, 14 May 2021

1950s vs 2020s

 





  We, as a society, love to boast about how far we've come. While we still have a way to go in so many ways, we're always proud of how the role of women has changed. While the 50s had women staying at home, being a housewife and caring for the children, now we are all expected to be career women. Just as controlling and restrictive and something that is often out of necessity rather than choice. There are those that choose, when possible, to be stay-at-home wives and mothers. There are those that would rather have a career and there are those that have no choice. However, what is expected in both cases is very different these days. So let's see how being a good wife in the 50s, compares to being a good wife today.

Have dinner ready.

Plan ahead, even the night before, to have a delicious meal ready on time. This is a way of letting him know that you have been thinking about him and are concerned about his needs. Most men are hungry when they come home and the prospect of a good meal is part of the warm welcome needed.

  Many couples now make meals together, take turns, have the man doing it, or have the woman take on the traditional role. Cooking is often seen as a pleasure rather than a chore (not always) and while there are women who like to take on the traditional role of cooking for their family, they are not expected to have dinner on the table by five and while they may plan in advance, it's more for their own reasons than out of a need to care for their husbands.

Prepare yourself.

Take fifteen minutes to rest so that you are refreshed when he arrives. Touch up your makeup, put a ribbon in your hair and be fresh looking. He has just been with a lot of work-weary people. Be a little gay and a little more interesting. His boring day may need a lift.

Women today often get in close to the same time as their husbands, both having been at work. While some women may touch up their make-up it is for their benefit so they don't leave work a mess. As for having a rest and perking up, we not only rarely have time, we are just as work-weary as our husbands.

Clear away the clutter.
Make one last trip through the main part of the house. Gather up the books, toys, and newspapers. Dust the tables so that they appear clean. Your husband will feel that he has reached his haven of rest and order. Doing this for him will give you a lift also.

As our children are usually at school or nursery, clutter is either from the early morning or is our own. Sometimes we manage to clear it, sometimes we just navigate. While it can feel good to have a tidy up or have a tidy house, often such tasks are reserved for weekends or our one day off. Also, it's usually a joint job for couples. Sometimes it is never touched except five minutes before you're having guests.

Prepare the children.
Take a few minutes to wash their faces and hands. Comb their hair and change their clothes if it is necessary to make them look presentable to him. They are “God’s Creatures” and your husband would like to see them playing their part.

We keep the kids alive these days and we're proud. Yes, we sometimes tell them to clean up but that's usually because we don't want whatever they've put their hands in today to poison them. If our spouses expect us to present them with beautiful clean children, we leave them alone with them for a few hours, we never hear a complaint again.

Minimize all noise.

At the time of his arrival, eliminate all the noises of the washer, dryer, dishwasher, and vacuum. You’ve had plenty of time to do these things during the day. Don’t do them now. Encourage your children to be quiet. Be happy to see your husband. Greet him with a warm smile.

We've been at work, the dishwasher needs running we run it! A lot of chores are done as and when these days. And while we probably are still telling the kids to sit down and shut up and we're happy to see the other person, we're both tired from work, we smile tiredly if at all.

Do not greet your husband with problems or complaints.

Don’t complain when he is late for dinner. Count this as minor when compared to what he had to go through today.

If we cooked dinner you better be home in time to eat it. We didn't go to that effort for it to go cold and dry and for you to have to stick it in the microwave. And what you've gone through we've gone through. While we don't necessarily want you to come home for us to jump down your throat, sometimes we need to vent a little, let you know how we're feeling and sometimes you irritate the heck out of us, and honey, you need to understand it has just been one of those days!

Make him comfortable.

Have him lean back in a comfortable chair or suggest that he lie down for a few minutes in the bedroom. Have a cool or warm drink ready for him. Arrange his pillow and offer to take off his shoes. Speak in a low, soft, soothing and pleasant voice. Allow him to relax and unwind.

If he gets to lie down, WE get to lie down. If he has a drink WE have a drink. Some couples share a drink. A warm drink when they get in from work a colder drink when the kids are in bed. If we greeted our husband with an offer for them to lie down while we fetch them a drink and take off their shoes, they'd think we'd finally cracked, or we'd broken something they loved, or someone had died, or we crashed the car, or the bodysnatchers had finally come...

Listen to him.
You may have a dozen things to tell him but the moment of his arrival is not the time. Let him speak first.

We both talk when we're ready, though if it's important, we kind of need to tell him asap, otherwise we will forget. Both people need to be heard in a relationship. Some like to talk as soon as they get home, some like to wait a few minutes, some like to wait until they're both having a bit of relaxing time. We listen to our husbands and they listen to us. That's how it works.

Make the evening his.

He is special! Never complain that he does not take you out to dinner or to other pleasant entertainment. Instead, try to understand his world of strain and pressure, his need to unwind and relax. Remember that you relaxed all day waiting for his return. Now it’s his turn to enjoy what you enjoyed.

Oh hell no! Unless you're the crazy kept woman who calls yourself a housewife (housewives do housework dear, they don't have a maid) you've had a hard day too. Stay-at-home wife or not, you'll have had hard work and strain and pressure just like he is. We are BOTH needing to relax and unwind. We BOTH need to be made to feel special once in a while. Also, I find it so strange that women were expected to do all the cleaning, make the beds, look pretty and make the children look pretty yet they have spent the day 'relaxing'. It's like the women who work from home and have husbands that, for some reason, think that means they sit on the couch watching crap all day. Work is work. 

There are women who actually choose to be like Stepford Wives and enjoy being the epitome of a good wife from the 1950s. There are women who refuse to be anything like those women. There are people who would like to have that option but don't. There are plenty of single women who have to do all the housework and cooking while holding down a job. There are also men in that situation. There are men that like to take on the 'traditional' women's roles and be the stay-at-home dads and are househusbands. We do have more of a choice these days, even if some options are determined by the state of our finances more than personal preference. All in all, a perfect wife by 1950s standards is pretty alien to us now. Now don't get me wrong, if you prefer to take on traditional roles that's your perogative  when you try to impose it on others, that's when we will have problems. Are you more a 50s wife or a modern woman? Let me know in the comments.

Saturday, 8 May 2021

Tripadvisor Reviews: My reply

Funny Tripadvisor Reviews


  Since its launch in 1993, the internet has come a long way. Some of us do remember the days of dial-up, ask Jeeves (he was axed in 2006 but the search engine ask still exists) and how amazing it was. Everyone got very excited about e-mail and though snail mail may have seemed to be on its way out, now it's kind of done a 180 with email seen as a chore and people getting dead excited about getting letters. The internet changed the world forever and it just keeps going.
  Whatever people think about the internet, its content how, safe it is, etc it has become a part of everyday life for everybody, we're on it right now of course. One thing that many of us love about the internet is how many idiots, fools, and the like have learned how to use it and inadvertently given us endless entertainment. Many websites, blogs, and even comedians have trawled the internet comments to find these people. For one that I personally find great fun, have look on youtube for Dave Gorman's found poems. You can also trawl for these yourself or do what I do, let sites like boredpanda do it for me. 
  The UK (Northern Ireland, Wales, Scotland, and England) thrives off tourism. With our historic buildings, landmarks and more, we attract a lot of people to our shores. However, some people are very hard to please and don't bother doing any kind of research for themselves. While I don't wish to waste my time trying to reason with these people, I'll reply to them in this way. A way they probably will never see but you may enjoy.
  When there are multiple reviews I'll share them all and reply overall. After the reply, I'll write a paragraph of my reaction to the review.

Big Ben

  First of all, let me educate a little, Big Ben is actually the name of the bell inside the clock, not the clock itself. The tower in which it resides is actually called Elizabeth Tower. The construction of the clock tower began in 1843. It took seven years for the clock design to be finalised and in 1859, it was finally completed and started ticking on 31st May. Of course, Big Ben itself didn't start ringing till June, then broke, and so on and so forth. Either way, it is a famous landmark, often Instagrammed, and is a very recognisable tourist attraction. A little research (and probably a guidebook) could give you a little of its history if you were so inclined, it has a decent-sized one, but yes, it is a clock tower. A very old, tall one with a famous bell but a clock tower nonetheless. I do wonder what these people expected.








Reply Dear reviewers,
                                      We are sorry you were let down by our beautiful, historical clock tower. It is indeed little more than a famous clock with a famous bell. We have no plans to ever build it higher, nor will it change to a digital clock. That would spoil it in so many ways. While it was part of the structure blown up in V for Vendetta this was not out of dislike or disrespect for the clock, we advise you to reacquaint yourself with the plot. If you own a grandfather clock, we suggest in the future you Instagram that while enjoying a staycation at home. As an alternative, we suggest a trip to Legoland.
                    
 
  
First of all, well excuse us for not building it into the sky. We weren't aiming for a skyscraper or anything here and it's a historical building, we will maintain and restore it, but it ain't getting higher love. Also no, it won't be digital in thirty years. It's been an analogue clock for over 160 years and is run by clockwork, that is how the bell works. Also, it is essentially part of the House of parliament, that's why it was blown up in V for Vendetta, which by the way is a film based on a graphic novel, I feel whoever wrote that review may be confused and think it was real. I don't see anyone who made any false promises about what the clock tower is. I assume most people say "If you go to London, you should go and see Big Ben." It's like a checklist of things you're 'supposed' to visit if you go to London. And telling us it is a big clock? Yeah, we can kind of see that.
 
 

Arthur's Seat

  Simply put a hill in Scotland, it's actually an ancient volcano. Dormant of course, though maybe we should send a few of these people to Etna. The hill is popular as it is relatively easy to climb and provides spectacular panoramic views. There is dispute over the name. Some think is named for the legendary King Arthur, who is believed by many to have been King of England from the late 5th to early 6th century. Another theory that is is a corruption of Ã€rd-na-Said, Gaelic for Height of Arrows or Hill of the Archers. If it was at some time called Archer's Seat, it could have changed to Arthur's. It is what it is, a beautiful place, and a hill that is good to climb and rewards the walker with wonderful views. It doesn't really promise more.


Reply: Dear reviewer,
                                       We in no way meant to imply that this was an actual seat or seating area, sorry for the misunderstanding. If you wish to visit again may we suggest bringing a picnic blanket as to avoid unsightly stains. 


  Some people are far too literal. I wonder if that's why places in the UK with bottom in the name are not popular with tourists. Do these people believe the stories behind places like Devil's Nightcap? They obviously did not look this place up at all just heard about it. I usually look up a place before I go so would have probably taken a picnic blanket. If you're going to sit on the ground it's not really going to be clean.

Stonehenge

  You could probably guess where this is going. Stonehenge is a group of stones set out a certain way. While there have been many varying opinions and discussions on what it was actually for, it's now believed it was a burial ground for important people which was then used essentially as a venue. People from all over the country would meet there to celebrate the summer solstice. Prehistoric and impressive, it is a popular destination for tourists and natives alike.




Reply: Dear reviewers,    
                                         Apologies that you were not impressed, we were under the impression the name was a clue to what this was. As this is an important historical monument we regret to inform you that it shall not be destroyed, especially not to build something more modern here. We also feel the need to clarify it is not a pile of stones, the stones were placed in specific places for specific reasons we won't bore you with. In the future, we suggest maybe looking up a place before visiting as apparently place names are not informative.

  As a monument and landmark, Stonehenge is very important. It is a monument to our history, important discoveries were made here, and is a prehistoric marvel of engineering. The history behind it, which I won't go into here, is truly interesting and extraordinary. It was important from a religious standpoint and is the scene of the last real sense of togetherness and community. I think some people these days expect places to have lots to do and spoon-feed everything about it. 

Abbey Road


A very famous road, home to a very famous studio, that four very famous men recorded at then used a photo of them crossing said road for the cover of a very famous album, most everyone has heard of it. Many go to recreate the famous photo, even if it is just of them and people feel very privileged to visit the studio. A great achievement for a road to become a tourist attraction. However, some people went there, who apparently encountered drivers who didn't recognise a zebra crossing. 



Reply: Dear reviewer,
                                   We are sorry that you defied death to take pictures at Abbey Road. We can only assume that drivers did not give way, as required by law, at the zebra crossing. In the future, we suggest looking both ways and crossing at a time that either the drivers have stopped, or have plenty of time in which to do so.

  I assume this individual either loves to complain for some reason, didn't realise this was a zebra crossing, or crossed the road at a bad time. Either way, bit idiotic. I hope to one day go to Abbey Road and have my photo taken crossing the zebra crossing. I doubt I will need to risk my life to do so but I suppose with some of the people who really shouldn't be driving these days, I guess I will have to be prepared.

Ben Nevis

  While I have climbed mountains, it is not exactly on my list of things I enjoy. I do believe that you would know before climbing it, what it is and that it is high. I mean, at least those with eyes and more than two brain cells to rub together. It is another ancient volcano. It erupted and collapsed in on itself. I like the fact we have so many extinct volcanos in the UK.  I may climb it one day, I would not really expect there to be much at the top. Apparently, I am one of a small number.


Reply: Dear reviewer,
                                   We are sorry you didn't enjoy your trip to Ben Nevis. As this mountain is a third higher than Snowdon and quite steep, it is not feasible to have facilities at the top. In future, we suggest picking a shorter mountain, such as Snowdon.

Mount Snowdon is 1085mitres high. It has a train that can take you to the top where there are facilities. Ben Nevis is 1345mitres high and there are likely several reasons why there's nothing at the top. It may be that, as you have to climb it yourself, nothing up there would be used enough, and maintaining it would not be worth it. whatever the reason, this is yet another example of people not doing the proper research before they visit a place. I think most mountains are devoid of facilities at the top.

Giant's Causeway

  The result of an ancient volcanic fissure eruption, the giant's causeway is 40,000 interlocking basalt columns. A natural wonder that is an official nature reserve, some people go there merely to be able to say they have. The legend that gives the phenomena its name, is a good one. Irish giant Fionn and Scottish giant Benandonner got into a fight. When Benandonner challenged Fionn, Fionn built the causeway across the North channel to meet him. The rest of the story has several versions. In one Fionn beats Benendonner, in another Fionn, upon seeing the size of his opponent, hides. A third version is that Fionn's wife, Sadhbh, disguises Fionn as a baby and puts him in a cradle. Upon seeing the size of 'the baby', Benandonner realises the father would be much bigger,  and flees back to Scotland, destroying the causeway so that Fionn cannot follow him. At Fingal's Cave in Scotland, there are identical columns caused by the same ancient eruption, which probably influenced the story.

Reply: Dear reviewer,
                                   We are sorry you did not enjoy your recent visit to the Giant's Causeway. Yes, it is a lot of rocks. If you feel it was too far away and not worth your time or money we suggest doing a little research before going to natural wonders in the future.     

  It's bad enough when people complain about manmade wonders, like the individual who went to the colosseum and was annoyed because they couldn't find information for when performances would be on and it was so poorly maintained. You think I'm joking, I'm not. But natural wonders? What do these people expect? Do they just here about a place and go to it without finding out what it actually is? 

National Gallery

  National Gallery, makes me think art. Paintings mainly. There could be other things such as sculptures, photos, and sketches perhaps. Say gallery and I picture famous paintings by famous people adorning the walls. I truly wonder what other people expect.

Reply: Dear reviewer,
                                   We are sorry you did not enjoy your visit to the National Gallery. If you could let us know why famous pictures in a gallery disappointed you we would find it most helpful.

 I mean seriously, SERIOUSLY, what did they expect?

London Eye

  The London Eye, for those who don't know, is a very large observation wheel that was built in part to celebrate the new millennium. You can book a pod for yourself and any guests for events, such as weddings and parties. It has been referenced and shown in popular culture and was booked by a band to use as part of a music video. It is hugely popular and people often book tickets to make sure they'll be able to ride it when they visit. It boasts good views of London, especially on clear days. 



Reply: Dear reviewers,
                                     We are sorry you did not enjoy your ride on the London Eye. The differences between the eye and a Ferris wheel are that you are enclosed in a pod rather than sitting in the open air, more than three people can fit in a pod, you are treated to a high view of London, a photo is taken and it takes you to a height of 135 metres. It is an observational wheel, not a Ferris wheel. Of course, it is not an actual eye, that would be very unusual and could be something people find disturbing. In the future we suggest not going on something you can see will take you up high when you are not fond of heights.


  The man who says it's not an actual eye confuses me, did he think it was? Also, you would think people could see what it was before they got on. It has never claimed to be more than it is. I have been on it, I was not enthused but I'm not someone who does revel in the idea of an observational wheel. Also, why would you ride it if you're afraid of heights? Why didn't he leave his wife and daughter to enjoy it alone and go complain about Big Ben to pass the time?

Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew

  A botanical research and education institution, people visit Kew Gardens to see the beautiful and unusual plants and flowers. Pretty self-explanatory what it is, it still seems some people don't understand that sometimes, it is pretty much what it says on the tin.


Reply: Dear reviewer,
                                     We are sorry you did not enjoy your visit to Kew Gardens. We aim to show beautiful and exotic plants and offer a selection of light meals to those who spend the day with us. We suggest you avoid visiting gardens in the future.

  What do these people expect? It's a garden, it will have plants and flowers. What else is there going to be? Do you think maybe they were expecting a swing set?

The Roman Baths

  Buildings, statues, and really anything that has survived the fall of an entire empire and/or civilisation is always popular. a real glimpse into the lives of those who lived nearly 2000 years ago is amazing. These surviving constructions can teach us a lot, we can see styles from the time, the ingenuity of the Romans, and how they lived. An advanced civilisation, it can be fascinating to see how far they actually came in years long before the tools we have today were even dreamt of. 

Reply: Dear reviewer,
                                   We are sorry you did not enjoy your trip to the Roman Baths. As we understand that young people can find such attractions uninteresting, we suggest in the future you avoid them and instead learn about our varied past and culture by reading a history book or give up altogether and find an arcade.

  I understand to a point, some young people really aren't interested but it begs the question of why they went there in the first place. If they were dragged there why did they leave a review? Were they trying to deter young people? Just because you find a place boring doesn't mean you should give it a bad review, just decide it's not for you.

Edinburgh Castle

A castle in a beautiful location packed with history with activities for children and tours available, Edinburgh castle is a popular one. Also available for events such as weddings, it is said to be one of the most exciting castles to visit. If however, you are not interested in such things, it begs the question as to why you would go.




Reply: Dear reviewers,
                                     We are disappointed to hear you did not enjoy your visit to Edinburgh Castle. Becoming drunk and disorderly means you would be thrown out of most places and as this is a family-friendly attraction, we would not wish to encourage alcohol consumption. It is a castle so is much like a castle. If you do not find the history interesting we suggest you do more research before visiting castles in the future.      

  If there was a concert here I bet it was brilliant and I still wonder at people who need to drink alcohol to have fun. If you get drunk do you really expect no repercussions? Also, each castle has its own history. I don't think these reviewers actually tried the tours they just walked around themselves and lost interest. Castles are really attractions for architecture and history purposes. Other reasons are events on and venue hire, otherwise, why would you go in the first place? Tours are always useful and more informative. I have a feeling these people were just cheap and didn't want to spend a few extra pounds (I believe the audio tour is £3) to enhance the experience or, god forbid, learn something.

Warwick Castle

Now with a castle dungeon experience, I would love to go here one day. An old castle with people visiting from the 17th Century it has become a huge tourist attraction. With wax figures of historical figures and rooms said to be holding authentic furniture, it attracts thousands of visitors a year. With a history that dates back to 1066, there is much to see and do with seasonal events and even accommodation.


Reply: Dear reviewer,
                                   We are saddened to hear you did not enjoy your visit. We have never tried to emulate Disneyland and have been around over 800 years before Disneyland, therefore it is probably more accurate to say Disneyland is a Warwick Castle wannabe. We assure you our history is accurate but based on your review we suggest a trip to Disneyland is more your style.

  A Disneyland wannabe? Seriously? I think they took a little too much from Fantasy Land. I'm pretty sure if you added the price of parking, entrance and attractions, Disneyland is more expensive. I swear some people think these places are built for people's entertainment. Perhaps they should study a little more history themselves. Apparently historical places get it wrong.

The Angel of the North

A famous sculpture by Antony Gormley, the Angel of the North has stood guard over Northern England for over 20 years from its place in Gateshead. Recognised as an iconic example of public art and a symbol of Gateshead, it is the largest sculpture in Britain. 


Reply: Dear reviewer,
                                   We are sorry you did not enjoy viewing The Angel of the North. In the future, we suggest visiting buildings rather than sculptures

I kind of get where these people are coming from, although calling it a lump of metal is harsh. It's not that exciting I guess and you can see it from the motorway. I think most people go to see an incredible sculpture, perhaps get a close look and take a picture with their arms stretched out like Christ the Redeemer. Either way, a harsh review for an impressive piece of art. I do wonder a little what they expected. It's a sculpture, what do you want?


Windsor Castle

Of course, another castle makes the list. One of the reasons people visit the UK is for our historic buildings. Another is some people who love the royal family, or just the fact we have one. As such, their residences can be hot tourist spots. While there are some places we can't visit and some rooms which are off-limits, a visit to at least one royal residence is one to check off the list when visiting London.


Reply: Dear reviewer,
                                   We are sorry to hear you didn't enjoy your trip to Windsor Castle, we are however glad it likely means you will not return as your boyfriend harassing the guard is disrespectful and childish.

I really feel sorry for guards, people are always messing with them which I think is most unfair. I'm waiting for the day either rules are relaxed or one snaps and some idiot gets decked. I am starting to wonder what people expect when visiting castles. 

Chester Zoo

Having been described as one of the fifteen best zoos in the world, the best in the UK and third in the world, Chester Zoo is popular. With on-site restaurants, a play area, shops, kiosks and picnic areas, Chester Zoo has a lot to offer besides its animals. It puts on various events throughout the year and is the first zoo outside of New Zealand to breed the tuatara; a species of reptile that has survived from the Triassic period, over 250 million years ago.


Reply: Dear reviewer,
                                  We are sorry that you found it hard to observe the animals. I suppose you would prefer if we refrained from trying to keep them in their natural environment and instead kept them in cages for your viewing pleasure. We would like you to please explain what you mean by animals easting so we can tell you whether or not they do.

  Yeah sometimes animals are trying to keep cool, or warm, or are sleeping, or are shy, or perhaps are fed up of ugly creatures staring at them all day. I find it hard to believe that all of them kept out of sight when this person was around, or maybe the visitor was one of those loud obnoxious people the animals prefer to keep out of sight from. The ones who knock on snake enclosures to make them move. Also, it's so gratifying when someone who is complaining either can't spell or is so desperate to post their complaint they end up posting a rather glaring typing error.

There you have it, funny reviews we can judge people for, thank you internet. What do you think of these reviews, fair? Harsh? Confusing? Unbelievable? Let me know in the comments and if you enjoyed this post please share. Stay happy. healthy be kind and stay safe. 

Friday, 20 November 2020

Finding Freedom Rumours Confirmed

Meghan's Hypocrisy Exposed 



   When the book 'Finding Freedom' was released there was speculation about whether or not Meghan had been involved. After all, there were details that really only members of the Royal Family would know. The book had been called long-winded and overly sugary by many and people have been saying all along that there are parts of the book detailing thing that had to have come from Meghan, no-one else would know about it. While one of the authors, Omid Scobie, has always denied her involvement it has now been confirmed, by Meghan herself. That means that any claims by Meghan or anyone else that she was not involved with the book was a blatant lie. All us apparently cruel, judgemental people were bang on the money.

  For those of you who don't know, this information has come from court documents. Meghan has done what Americans do best and sued the associated press for invading her privacy, such as it is. This is already problematic because what right does someone sending photos to the press and signing a fly on the wall reality TV show deal have to demand privacy? You don't go on about privacy and then do a reality TV show. You just don't. It is further evidence of Meghan's blatant hypocrisy. It is helpful to a lot of people to now know that Meghan and Omid Scobie were lying through their teeth when they claimed she was not involved in his book, Finding Freedom. Any claims she makes against the press or anyone now will be called into question She has essentially admitted that she is a liar, not great during a court case.

  There is a further problem with this admission. While Meghan has now admitted to essentially violating her own privacy, it is likely this could have on impact on Meghan and Harry's deal with the Queen. I'm pretty sure any royal being involved with a book like this could be a serious breech of protocol. I think all Meghan seems to be doing recently is advertising why she is no longer fit to be a Duchess. There are rules to follow and she is pushing the boundaries to breaking point, dragging her husband into it with her. She seems to forget that she and Harry are still in a probationary period with the Queen. She may ultimately decide to strip them of their titles, especially if they break the agreement they made with her.

  It does seem to be getting to the point where the cracks in Meghan's claims, about anything, are turning into wide gaping holes. Her hypocrisy and lies are overshadowing her attempts to establish herself during a pandemic. It may be that she is trying desperately to grasp straws while her well structured story of victimisation, innocence and privacy plea unravels around her. This could be the first in a series of events that shows Meghan for who she really is. A lying, hypocritical, spotlight seeking has-been. I'm sure people will have a problem with me saying this. I'm sure for some unfathomable reason I'll be called a racist. (I have not once mentioned her race). I really don't care, I am entitled to my opinion and I'm sure I'm not the only one who has it. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex, which with any luck will no longer be called that before too long, are doing little to endear themselves to anyone at the moment and this latest admission, is just going to make things worse for them. Whatever you think of them, there is no denying that this time, she lied.
  

Wednesday, 18 November 2020

Forgotten Disney Films

 Forgotten Animated Disney Films


  Disney films, there are many. The forgotten ones are the early live action ones mostly, closely followed by bad/unnecessary sequels/prequels. The sequels and prequels are often a shameless attempt to cash-in. They are almost never as good or well-loved as the original. I think the only one that got good feedback was Cinderella III: A Twist In Time. Now there are Disney films that are underrated and those that are rightly passed over. Even Disney can't get it right every time. Whilst there are dozens of live action Disney films that seemed to have been forgotten, there are some animated ones that really don't get the recognition they deserve. While I may one day have the time and money to watch and critique all of them (donations are welcome) The ones I have seen are limited. Some big ones seem to be considered to be underrated, The Hunchback of Notre Dame, Tarzan, even The Princess and the Frog. I wish to focus however, on ones that are not only underrated, but often quite unfairly forgotten about. 

  I have seen most, but not all of these, I will explain why for some. One I have seen that seems forgotten about more often than not is the following.

The Three Caballeros 1944



   The Three Caballeros is one of those films that combined animation with live-action. That was still pretty cool back in the 40s, if not an exact art. This is a rare one as it is essentially about Donald Duck, not a member of the Disney family you expect to have his own film. However it is not an origins story or anything like that, it is just that Donald Duck is the only Disney character that features and it is about him celebrating his birthday. Now, while a forgotten film it is not an underrated one. This is very much of it's time. Not an easy story to follow, it is sexist, racist (set in Mexico but nothing but white faces) and confusing. I have only watched this once, I may watch it again one day but it is not one I am eager to rewatch. There is one good thing about this film, the title song. The song itself and the sequence that accompanies it is worth watching. I have always loved it. Remember Disney sing-along songs? It was on one of those. I did see a promo for the film itself at the beginning of one of my many Disney VHS tapes (do not ask me which one I have no idea).  Other than this, I never really heard about it. Now I have watched it and it was okay I guess. You are not missing much if you don't have it. Also I'm pretty sure the last part is Donald Duck on a drug trip, I think he took something in Mexico, I can't explain the last sequence any other way. If you want to watch it feel free but if you are not that bothered, rest assured you really are not missing anything. You can watch the title song segment on Youtube after all.

Make Mine Music 1946



 Now, I sadly haven't seen this, I do plan to one day. A wartime film it is a little like Fantasia in it's structure. Lots of segments put together to make a film. I do remember seeing a trailer for this because it features Peter and The Wolf. I distinctly remember that. Basically this is music songs that have had animated segments made to go with them. It is a film though, and seems to be stories rather than sequences. A little more of a narrative than Fantasia. Like I said I haven't seen it so I don't know how good it is but it does seem to have sadly been largely forgotten.

Fun and Fancy Free 1947 



  The original of this had two stories, Bongo the Bear and Mickey and the Beanstalk. Now I had a video called Mickey and the Beanstalk, I did not have Fun and Fancy Free. I have no recollection at all of the story of Bongo the Bear so I'm thinking Mickey and the Beanstalk was released on it's own and I had that. Now that, was good clean fun. No it is not challenging, yes we pretty much know the story (they changed it a little) and yes there is a slightly disturbing scene where a starving Donald Duck goes a little crazy from hunger but I think it is underrated. As you can tell from the cover Goofy is also in this film. When did a film that is just good clean fun become a bad thing? These days there has to be a really compelling story and a moral and CGI but this a gem of the animation era. I loved this film and even today I think it is enjoyable. If you haven't seen this I really think you should. Of course, I can't really comment on the Bongo the Bear story but Mickey and the Beanstalk, I think it's worth it. Also, for us fans who care, this is the last time Walt Disney voiced Mickey Mouse. That's got to mean something.

 The Adventures of Ichabod and Mr Toad 1949



  I really want this! I think I'll buy this post Christmas and finally see it. I remember again, seeing a trailer for this on a VHS. The Legend of Sleepy Hollow is an interesting story for Disney to tackle and is, as I understand, one of it's darker ones. Although I saw the characters of Rat and Mole from the Wind in the Willows cast in different roles for another Disney adaptation I have never actually watched this film. As such I can't really say whether or not it's underrated but it is often forgotten and actually sounds like good fun to me. Maybe the darker themes put people off.

Bedknobs and Broomsticks 1971



  Not one of the best Disney films it is far from the worst. Maybe a little dated now but it does have it's moments and although technically this is mostly a live action film, it does have the live action and animation treatment in a couple of it's more memorable scenes. I do think this is underrated, possibly because it is another one that is a lot of fun. There are dark moments too, after all it is set during the second world war and follows three children evacuated to the home of a witch. A good witch as far as it goes but a witch nonetheless. There is also her slightly unscrupulous friend. A good family film too often overlooked. 

Robin Hood 1973


  The animal kingdom's version of Robin Hood. Okay so it's rushed and it's little more than recycled scenes stuck together haphazardly but it's an easy watch and while there are only a few songs, both Oo-De-Lally and The Phony King of England are worth a listen. A forgotten film featuring the voice of Peter Ustinov I think it is a little underrated. I may be biased as I do love the song Oo-De-Lally (UK residents may recognise it from the Android advert a few years ago). With drama, romance, comedy, action and a nail biting castle scene, this forgotten gem ticks all the Disney boxes.



The Many Adventures of Winnie The Pooh 1977

 
 I love Winnie-the-Pooh, I really do! I did have most of the original tales growing up courtesy of my Mother's collection. They were and are stories I find very enjoyable. Now of course you can say it's about mental illness, or religion or whatever else you can find (you can do that with anything these days) but Winnie-The-Pooh is about a boy's adventures with his soft toys. Winnie-the-Pooh is of course a bear, there is also Piglet, Tigger, Owl, Rabbit, Kanga, Roo and Eeyore.  This was a collection of the original stories and it seems to have been completely forgotten. It is underrated, after all, these are stories loved by many and seem to have stood the test of time admirably. Another film underrated purely because it's good clean fun.

The Rescuers 1977/ The Rescuers Down Under 1990


 



  The Rescuers is about the 'Rescue Aid Society', a society of mice from every country in the world who meet when they believe someone is in need of their help. Someone takes the assignment and tries to help. Bianca from Hungary and Bernard from the USA take on the assignment to help a young orphan called Penny who has been kidnapped from the orphanage and sent a plea for help in a bottle. While a still from this film has made the rounds on the internet, when someone spotted the picture of a topless lady in the background, the film itself is not a popular one. I love this film. It had plenty of dark moments as well as comedy. It is a film that I believe has not aged as badly as it could have done. Of course it has a sequel.



  A rare Disney sequel that is as good as the original, The Rescuers Down Under managed to be good by eliminating supporting characters from the first film. The Rescue Aid Society and the two main characters are still here but, even though there is a reference to a character from the first film, no other characters appear. While it technically can be watched without watching the first one I think it helps a little with character development.  Also this is a little darker but no less enjoyable. While there are some moments that will tug at the heartstrings a little, this is a Disney film and is very enjoyable. Two films that really have taken an unearned backseat. Ones to watch.


Mickey's Christmas Carol 1983


  Mickey Mouse, 92 years young and counting, has taken on a few classic tales. The Prince and the Pauper in 1990 was his first time back in cinemas for almost ten years. 
  This film features characters from The Adventures of Ichabod and Mr Toad, Pinocchio, Mickey and the Beanstalk and Robin Hood. 
  In this, Mickey Mouse takes on the role of Bob Cratchit while Minnie (his wife for at least 77 years now) played his wife. No prizes for guessing who played Ebenezer Scrooge and his nephew. In a departure from some Mickey Mouse films all the characters took on roles from the original story and no-one played themselves. I think my favourite is Goofy as Jacob Marley. not the only adaptation of this classic tale it is a faithful one and a great Disney film for the Christmas season. 

The Black Cauldron 1985


  Now here is a forgotten one. Even those who know of it have rarely seen it (in my experience). I'm sure some hardcore Disney fans have this in their collection, this is one I have yet to see. Now this may be a good thing. I have seen clips and the villain in this terrifies me! Up until this I though Chernabog (the mountain in Fantasia) was the scariest Disney character but the Horned King is really frightening. 
  For a film from the 80s this is pretty dark! No I haven't seen it but I have heard good things. While this is nobody's favourite Disney film (as far as I know) it receives a lot of praise from fans. I do plan to see it one day, not on my own perhaps. It is one that is often overlooked so I look forward to seeing if it's deserved or not.

The Great Mouse Detective 1986


  Who doesn't love a mouse version of Sherlock Holmes? Basil of Baker Street is The Great Mouse Detective in this forgotten gem. Investigating the disappearance of a toy maker, Basil and his new friend Dr Dawson struggle to care for Olivia while searching for her father, kidnapped by Basil's arch nemesis, Professor Ratigan. This could have easily been made into a series of films but I think it was better to just stick to the one. A recording of the late (even then) great Basil Rathbone was used for a short scene featuring Sherlock Holmes. In one of his last and best-loved roles, Vincent Price voices the evil Professor Ratigan. 
  A very under-rated film it did enjoy critical and financial success when it was released. It is a gripping story with plenty of dark moments (the line "worse than the widows and orphans you drowned" was a shock when I finally heard it) interlaced with drama and comedy. One of my favourite moments has to be the song 'World's Greatest Criminal Mind'. With a clever plot and terrifying final scene, it is a film every Disney fan should see at least once.

Oliver and Company 1988


  I waited years to see this film and I can honestly say, I was disappointed. The Disney version of Oliver is forgettable with a rushed storyline and the bare minimum of Disney charm. I think Disney missed a trick here, they could have done a lot more with both this story and this film. Not a lot happens in this film and whoever wrote the songs only had one that is memorable. Now don't get me wrong, younger children will probably like it but it fails as a family film. It's one redeeming quality? Billy Joel as Dodger. Not really worth watching as far as I'm concerned. By all means do, it is a little like 'The Three Cabelleros' in that I'm glad I watched it but doubt I will again. Do watch/listen to the song 'Why Should I Worry?" though, that is worth it.

Duck Tales The Movie: Treasure of the Lost Lamp 1990


  I used to love Duck Tales, I still love the song. I know the series was re-made but the opening titles put me off. I thought the animation was awful and the song wasn't as good. It was the same song but badly done. Why mess with a classic? I could have probably really liked new episodes if at least the animation had been the same but I really felt they ruined it. This film though, this is a classic. Featuring Scrooge McDuck, his nephews Huey, Dewey and Louie and their friend Webby, this is a good old-fashioned Disney film. Showing plenty of moments with Scrooge's slightly softer side, it is a fun family film. You could probably guess the main storyline, it is a little Aladdin meets Ali Baba but original enough to not be boring. A must see for Duck Tales fans, highly recommended to everyone else.

James and the Giant Peach 1996


  I admit I didn't know this was a Disney film. I saw it at the cinema knowing the story (I was a Roald Dahl fan as a child) and knowing it was a child's film but I had no idea it was a Disney one. A rare stop-motion animation film (with live action at the beginning and end) it worked quite well. As Roald Dahl stories can be very dark the story was changed a little but the main plot was still there and I did enjoy it. Forgotten more as people don't know it's a Disney film and a rare move from Disney doing stop-motion instead of drawn animation it's not one I miss oddly, thought I would when I first saw it. Is it underrated? I really don't know, it is forgotten. Worth a watch definitely but not one I feel I need in my collection. Maybe because I've seen it a few times and remember it well. Maybe because I know the story so well. Either way not one I think I'll buy anytime soon.

Enchanted 2007


  A little like Bedknobs and Broomsticks this is mostly live action but spends a reasonable amount of time as an animation, so it counts. Enchanted is a very modern Disney film, poking fun at the traditional fairy tales Disney started with. As it says, a Disney classic with a twist, it takes the well-known Disney elements and drops them into the real world. A very funny comedy, this is one for the family to enjoy. For us girls there is Dr McDreamy, for the kids there's the Disney classic and for the family it's the twist. At first glance almost a silly film, it works remarkably well and is often better than people expect. Passed over without people actually seeing it, it is definitely underrated. One I highly recommend to all.

So, a few to add the list if you haven't already seen them. Find them (if you can) on Disney+ or do it the old fashioned way. If you are in isolation or going through lockdown still it is a good excuse to catch up on Disney films. If not, do you really need an excuse when it's Disney?